Search for: All records

Coral reefs face unprecedented threats from climate change and human activities, making reef restoration increasingly important for the preservation of marine biodiversity and the sustainability of coastal communities. One promising restoration method relies on coral breeding and larval settlement, but this approach requires further innovation to achieve high rates of settlement and survival. In this study, we built on our previous work engineering lime mortar-based coral settlement substrates by investigating three different compositions of a natural hydraulic lime (NHL) base material as well as composite NHL substrates containing alkaline earth metals. These materials were tested with larvae of three reef-building Caribbean coral species: Orbicella faveolata (Mountainous star coral), Diploria labyrinthiformis (Grooved brain coral), and Colpophyllia natans (Boulder brain coral). We found that the base material composition, including its silicate and calcium carbonate (CaCO3) content, as well as the addition of the inorganic additives strontium carbonate (SrCO3), magnesium carbonate (MgCO3), and magnesium sulfate (MgSO4), all influenced coral larval settlement rates. Overall, NHL formulations with lower concentrations of silicate and higher concentrations of calcium, strontium, and magnesium carbonates significantly increased coral settlement. Further, when dissolved ions of magnesium and strontium were added to seawater, both had a significant effect on larval motility, with magnesium promoting settlement and metamorphosis in C. natans larvae, supporting the observation that these additives are also bioactive when incorporated into substrates. Our results demonstrate the potential benefits of incorporating specific inorganic ion additives such as Mg2+ and Sr2+ into substrates to facilitate early coral life history processes including settlement and metamorphosis. Further, our results highlight the importance of optimizing multiple aspects of coral substrate design, including material composition, to promote settlement and survival in coral propagation and reef restoration. 

Abstract Surface performance is critically influenced by topography in virtually all real-world applications. The current standard practice is to describe topography using one of a few industry-standard parameters. The most commonly reported number is$$R$$ $R$a, the average absolute deviation of the height from the mean line (at some, not necessarily known or specified, lateral length scale). However, other parameters, particularly those that are scale-dependent, influence surface and interfacial properties; for example the local surface slope is critical for visual appearance, friction, and wear. The present Surface-Topography Challenge was launched to raise awareness for the need of a multi-scale description, but also to assess the reliability of different metrology techniques. In the resulting international collaborative effort, 153 scientists and engineers from 64 research groups and companies across 20 countries characterized statistically equivalent samples from two different surfaces: a “rough” and a “smooth” surface. The results of the 2088 measurements constitute the most comprehensive surface description ever compiled. We find wide disagreement across measurements and techniques when the lateral scale of the measurement is ignored. Consensus is established through scale-dependent parameters while removing data that violates an established resolution criterion and deviates from the majority measurements at each length scale. Our findings suggest best practices for characterizing and specifying topography. The public release of the accumulated data and presented analyses enables global reuse for further scientific investigation and benchmarking.